probenerИзвестия высших учебных заведений. ПРОБЛЕМЫ ЭНЕРГЕТИКИPower engineering: research, equipment, technology1998-99032658-5456Kazan State Power Engineering University10.30724/1998-9903-2020-22-1-113-127probener-1291Research ArticleЭНЕРГЕТИКАPOWER ENGINEERINGMодульные установки комбинированного производства электроэнергии и жидких топлив на основе древесной биомассыModular plants for combined biomass-based production of electricity and synthetic liquid fuelТюринаЭ. А.TyurinaE. A.

Тюрина Элина Александровна – д-р техн. наук, ведущий научный сотрудник лаборатории теплосиловых систем

г. Иркутск

Elina A. Tyurina

130, Lermontov str., Irkutsk

tyurina@isem.irk.ruМедниковА. С.MednikovA. S.

Медников Александр Станиславович – канд. техн. наук, научный сотрудник лаборатории теплосиловых систем

г. Иркутск

Alexander S. Mednikov

130, Lermontov str., Irkutsk

mednikov@isem.irk.ruЕлсуковП. Ю.ElsukovP. Yu.

Елсуков Павел Юрьевич – канд. техн. наук, научный сотрудник лаборатории теплосиловых систем

г. Иркутск

Pavel Yu. Elsukov

RAS, 130, Lermontov str., Irkutsk

els@isem.irk.ruИнститут систем энергетики им. Л.А. Мелентьева СО РАНРоссияMelentiev Energy Systems Institute SB RASRussian Federation202030042020221113127Copyright © Тюрина Э.А., Медников А.С., Елсуков П.Ю., 20202020Тюрина Э.А., Медников А.С., Елсуков П.Ю.Tyurina E.A., Mednikov A.S., Elsukov P.Y.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.energyret.ru/jour/article/view/1291

Высокая цена квалифицированного жидкого топлива в отдаленных районах Сибири и Дальнего Востока, а так же значительные запасы древесной биомассы в этих районах определяют актуальность представляемых исследований. Комплексная переработка древесной биомассы в синтетические жидкие топлива и электроэнергию позволит повысить энергетическую и экономическую эффективность переработки техногенных отходов, а так же улучшить экологическую обстановку указанных районов.

Целью работы является технико-экономическая оптимизация параметров модульных установок комбинированного производства электроэнергии и метанола из древесной биомассы.

В статье приведен анализ ранее выполненных работ по теме исследований. На его основе выбрано одно из эффективных направлений переработки древесной биомассы: окислительная конверсия этого сырья газифицирующим агентом с получением газа, обогащённого водородом и оксидами углерода; синтез из него квалифицированных жидких топлив; получение электроэнергии путем утилизации тепла конверсии, синтеза и тепла при сжигании продувочного газа процесса синтеза.

Приведена технологическая схема модульной энерготехнологической установки (МЭТУ), математическая модель ее элементов и схемы в целом. На основе разработанных методических подходов выполнены оптимизационные исследования технико-экономических параметров и конструкции модульной энерготехнологической установки.

В результате исследований получены оптимальные показатели представляемой технологии. Показано, что производство электроэнергии и метанола на основе биомассы с учетом комбинирования процессов повышает термический КПД процесса синтеза на 12% и выше, уменьшает инвестиции на 15-20% по сравнению с раздельным производством. При заданной эффективности инвестиций 15% стоимость метанола, произведенного из древесной биомассы составит 275-317 дол./т у.т. При такой стоимости метанол может конкурировать с как котельно-печным, так и моторным топливом в восточных регионах России.

The high costs of qualified liquid fuels in remote areas of Siberia and the Far East, as well as significant stocks of wood biomass in these areas determine the relevance of the presented studies. The integrated processing of woody biomass into synthetic liquid fuel and electricity will increase the energy and economic efficiency of processing technological waste, as well as improve the environmental situation in these areas.

The aim of the work is technical and economic optimization of parameters modular installations of the combined production of electricity and methanol from woody biomass.

The article presents an analysis of previously performed work on the topic of research and, based on them, selected one of the most effective ways to process wood biomass - oxidative conversion of this raw material to produce gas enriched in hydrogen and carbon oxides, synthesis of qualified liquid fuels and generating electricity when burning purge gas synthesis process.

The technological scheme of modular plants for combined biomass-based production of electricity and synthetic liquid fuel, its mathematical model of its elements and the scheme as a whole are given. On the basis of the selected methods, optimization studies of the operation of a modular energy technology installation were carried out.

Analysis of the results showed that the combined production of electricity and methanol based on biomass increases the thermal efficiency of the process by 12% and reduces investment by 15-20% compared with separate production. With an internal rate of return of capital of 15%, the cost of methanol from biomass will be 275-317 dollars per ton. At such a cost, methanol can compete with both boiler-furnace and motor fuels in the eastern regions of Russia.

метанолпереработка древесной биомассыпроизводство электроэнергиимодульные установкисинтетические жидкие топливаmethanolprocessing wood biomasselectricity productionmodular plantssynthetic liquid fuelsРабота выполнена при финансовой поддержке РФФИ (проект 18-08- 01184 А) и госзадания по проекту 17.1.1 (рег. ном. АААА-А17-117030310433-6).The research was carried out under State Assignment, Project 17.1.1 (reg. no. АААА-А17-117030310433-6) of the Fundamental Research of Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences and the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project 18-08-01184 A).ReferencesGeorge A., Olah., Alain Goeppert, et al. Beyond Oil and Gas. 2 ed/ Wiley-VCH. The Methanol // Economy. 2011. 356 p.George A. Olah, Alain Goeppert, Surya GK. Prakash Beyond Oil and Gas: The Methanol. Economy. Wiley-VCH; 2 ed. 2011.356 p.Sunggyu Lee., James G. Speight., Sudarshan K. Loyalka. Handbook of Alternative Fuel Technologies, Second Edition. CRC Press // Taylor & Francis Group, LLC, 2015. 712 p.Sunggyu Lee, James G. Speight, Sudarshan K. Loyalka Handbook of Alternative Fuel Technologie. 2 ed. CRC Press. Taylor & Francis Group, LLC, 2015. 712 p.Firmansyah H., Tan Y., Yan J. Power and methanol production from biomass combined with solar and wind energy: analysis and comparison // Energy Procedia 2018. V.145. pp.576-81.Firmansyah H, Tan Y, Yan J. Power and methanol production from biomass combined with solar and wind energy: analysis and comparison. Energy Procedia. 2018; 145:576–81.Yang S, Li B, Zheng J, Kankala RK. Biomass-to-Methanol by dual-stage entrained flow gasification: Design and techno-economic analysis based on system modeling. Journal of Cleaner Production 2018; 205:364-74.Martín M, Grossmann IE. Towards zero CO 2 emissions in the production of methanol from switch grass. CO2 to methanol. Computers & Chemical Engineering. 2017; 105:308-16.Martín M, Grossmann IE. Towards zero CO 2 emissions in the production of methanol from switch grass. CO2 to methanol. Computers & Chemical Engineering 2017. V.105. pp.308-16.Yang S, Li B, Zheng J, et al. Biomass-to-Methanol by dual-stage entrained flow gasification: Design and techno-economic analysis based on system modeling. Journal of Cleaner Production 2018; 205:364–74.Moellenbruck F, Kempken T, Dierks M, Oeljeklaus G, Goerner K. Cogeneration of power and methanol based on a conventional power plant in Germany // Journal of Energy Storage 2018.V.19. pp.393-401.Moellenbruck F, Kempken T, Dierks M, Oeljeklaus G, Goerner K. Cogeneration of power and methanol based on a conventional power plant in Germany. Journal of Energy Storage 2018; 19:393-401.Bai Z., Liu., Gong L., et al. Thermodynamic and economic analysis of a solar-biomass gasification system with the production of methanol and electricity // Energy Procedia. 2018. V.152. pp. 1045–1050.Bai Z, Liu Q, Gong L, et al. Thermodynamic and economic analysis of a solar-biomass gasification system with the production of methanol and electricity. Energy Procedia 2018; 152:1045-50.Клер АМ Эффективные методы схемно-параметрической оптимизации сложных теплоэнергетических установок: разработка и применение. Монография. Новосибирск: Академическое изд-во «Гео», 2018. 145 с.Kler AM. Effective methods of circuit-parametric optimization of complex heat and power plants: development and use. Novosibirsk: Academic publishing house "Geo", 2018. 145 p. doi: 10.21782/В978-5-6041446-0-2.Gao Z., Huang W., Yin L., Xie K. Liquid-phase preparation of catalysts used in slurry reactors to synthesize dimethyl ether from syngas: Effect of heat-treatment atmosphere // Fuel Processing Technology. 2009. V.9. pp.1442-1446.Gao Z, Huang W, Yin L, et al. Liquid-phase preparation of catalysts used in slurry reactors to synthesize dimethyl ether from syngas: Effect of heat-treatment atmosphere, Fuel Processing Technology. 2009;90:1442-1446.Guang-jian L., Zheng L., Ming-hua W., Wei-dou N. Energy savings by co-production: A methanol/electricity case study // Applied Energy. 2010. V.8. pp. 2854-2859.Guang-jian L, Zheng L, Ming-hua W, et al. Energy savings by co-production: A methanol/electricity case study. Applied Energy. 2010;87:2854-2859.Hetland J., Anantharaman R. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) options for co-production of electricity and synthetic fuels from indigenous coal in an Indian context // Energy for Sustainable Development. 2009. V.13. pp. 56-63.Hetland J, Anantharaman R. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) options for co-production of electricity and synthetic fuels from indigenous coal in an Indian context. Energy for Sustainable Development. 2009;13:56-63.Larson E., Fiorese G., Liu G., et al. (), Co-production of decarbonized synfuels and electricity from coal + biomass // Energy Environ Science. 2010. V.3. pp. 28-42.Larson E, Fiorese G, Liu G, et al. Co-production of decarbonized synfuels and electricity from coal + biomass. Energy Environ Science. 2010;3:28-42.Manzolini G., Macchi E., Gazzani M. (), CO 2 capture in Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle with SEWGS – Pt B: Economic assessment, Fuel. 2013. V.105. pp. 220-227.Manzolini G, Macchi E, Gazzani M. CO2 capture in Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle with SEWGS – Pt B: Economic assessment. Fuel. 2013;105:220-227.Pellegrini L., Soave G., Gamba S., Lange S. Economic analysis of a combined energy–methanol production plant // Applied Energy. 2011. V.88. pp. 4891-4897.Pellegrini L, Soave G, Gamba S, Lange S. Economic analysis of a combined energy–methanol production plant. Applied Energy. 2011;88:4891-4897.Robinson K, Tatterson D. Economics on Fischer–Tropsch coal-to-liquids method updated // Oil Gas J.2008. V.106. pp. 22-52.Robinson K, Tatterson D. Economics on Fischer–Tropsch coal-to-liquids method updated. Oil Gas J. 2008;106:22-52.Sajo P. Naik, Taegong Ryu, Vy Bui, et al. Synthesis of DME from CO 2 /H 2 gas mixture // Chemical Engineering Journal. 2011;167(1):362-368.Sajo P. Naik, Taegong Ryu, Vy Bui, et al. Synthesis of DME from CO 2 /H 2 gas mixture. Chemical Engineering Journal.2011;167(1):362-368.Sun S., Jin H., Gao L., Han W. Study on a multifunctional energy system producing coking heat, methanol and electricity // Fuel. 2010;89:1353-1360.Sun S, Jin H, Gao L, et al. Study on a multifunctional energy system producing coking heat, methanol and electricity. Fuel. 2010;89:1353-1360.Kler AM., Tyurina EA., Mednikov AS. A plant for methanol and electricity production: Technical-economic analysis // Energy 2018. V.165. pp. 890-899.Kler AM, Tyurina EA, Mednikov AS. A plant for methanol and electricity production: Technical-economic analysis. Energy. 2018;165:890–899.Клер А.М., Деканова Н.П., Тюрина Э.А. и др. Теплоэнергетическе системы: Оптимизационные исследования. Новосибирск: Наука, 2005. 236 с.Kler AM, Dekanova NP, Tyurina EA. Thermal Power Systems: Optimization Studies. Novosibirsk: Nauka; 2005.Kler AM., Tyurina EA., Mednikov AS. Energy-technology installations for combined production of hydrogen and electricity with CO2 removal systems // International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2011, V. 36, Issue 1, pp. 1230–1235.Kler AM, Tyurina EA, Mednikov AS. Energy-technology installations for combined production of hydrogen and electricity with CO2 removal systems. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2011;36(1):1230–1235 pp.Kler A.M., Zharkov P.V., Epishkin N.O. An effective approach to optimizing the parameters of complex thermal power plants // Thermophysics and Aeromechanics. 2016. V. 23. № 2. pp. 289-296.Kler AM, Zharkov PV, Epishkin NO. An effective approach to optimizing the parameters of complex thermal power plants. Thermophysics and Aeromechanics. 2016;23(2):289-296.Kler AM, Tyurina EA. Production of products of deep coal processing: modeling of technologies, comparison of efficiency // The burning and plasma chemistry 2007.V.4. pp. 276-81.Kler AM, Tyurina EA. Production of products of deep coal processing: modeling of technologies, comparison of efficiency. The burning and plasma chemistry 2007; 4:276-81.Тюрина ЭА, Клер АМ. Оптимизационные исследования энергетических установок и комплексов. Новосибирск: Академическое изд-во «Гео», 2016. 298 с.Optimization studies of power plants and complexes. Novosibirsk: Academic publishing house "Geo", 2016. 298 p.Berezina LA., Matyshak VA., Korchak VN., et al. An in SITU IR spectroscopic study of methanol conversion on an SNM-1 catalyst // Kinetics and Catalysis. 2009. V. 50. № 5. С. 775-783.Berezina LA, Matyshak VA, Korchak VN, et al. An in SITU IR spectroscopic study of methanol conversion on an SNM-1 catalyst. Kinetics and Catalysis. 2009;50(5):775-783.Rozovskii A.Ya., Lin G.I. Fundamentals of methanol synthesis and decomposition Topics in Catalysis. 2003. Т. 22. № 3-4. С. 137-150.Rozovskii AYa, Lin GI. Fundamentals of methanol synthesis and decomposition. Topics in Catalysis. 2003;22(3-4):137-150.Розовский А.Я., Лин Г.И. Теоретические основы процесса синтеза метанола. М.: Химия, 1990. 272 с.Rozovsky AYa, Lin GI. The theoretical basis of the process of methanol synthesis. M .: Chemistry, 1990. 272 p.Skvortsov L. Explicit stabilized Runge-Kutta methods // Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics. 2011. V. 51. pp. 1153-1166.Skvortsov L. Explicit stabilized Runge-Kutta methods. Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics. 2011;51:1153–1166. doi: 10.1134/S0965542511070165.Martín-Vaquero J., Kleefeld B. Extrapolated stabilized explicit Runge–Kutta methods // Journal of Computational Physics. 2016. V. 326. pp. 141–155.Martín-Vaquero J, Kleefeld B. Extrapolated stabilized explicit Runge–Kutta methods. Journal of Computational Physics. 2016;326:141–155.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.