Identification of line status changes using phasor measurements through deep learning networks
https://doi.org/10.30724/1998-9903-2020-22-6-55-67
Abstract
THE PURPOSE. To consider the problem of detecting changes in a power grid topology that occurs as a result of the power line outage / turning on. Develop the algorithm for detecting changes in the status of transmission lines in real time by using voltage and current phasors captured by phasor measurement units (PMUs) are placed on buses. Carry out experimental research on IEEE 14-bus test system. METHODS. This paper proposes a method from the field of artificial intelligence such as machine learning in particular "Deep Learning" to solve the problem. Deep Learning arises as a computational learning technique in which high level abstractions are hierarchically modelled from raw data. One of the means to effectively extract the inherent hidden features in data are Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). RESULTS. The article describes the topic relevance, offers to apply the method for detecting status of lines using a CNN classifier. The combination of different CNN architectures and the number of time slices from the moment of line status change are used to detect the power grid topology. The effectiveness of the joint use of PMUs and CNN in solving this problem has been proven. CONCLUSION. A solution for the line status change detection in the transient states using a CNN classifier is proposed. A high accuracy of the line status detection was obtained despite the influence of noise on measurement data. A change in the network topology is detected at the very beginning of the transient state almost instantly. It will allow the operator several times during the first seconds to identify the line state in order to make sure that the decisions made are correct.
About the Authors
N. E. Gotman
Federal Research Center Komi Scientific Center of the Ural Branch Russian Academy of Sciences, ISE and EPN
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Natalia E. Gotman
Syktyvkar
G. P. Shumilova
Federal Research Center Komi Scientific Center of the Ural Branch Russian Academy of Sciences, ISE and EPN
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Galina P. Shumilova
Syktyvkar
References
1. Mokeyev AV. Development, testing and Introduction Features of Phasor Measurement Units. Modern approaches to power system reliability support. Syktyvkar, 2014. pp. 56-62.
2. Tate JE, Overbye TJ. Line outage detection using phasor angle measurements. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. 2008;23(4):1644–1652.
3. Kim T, Wright SJ. PMU placement for line outage identification via multinomial logistic regression. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid. 2018;9(1):122–131.
4. Cavraro G, Arghandeh R. Power distribution network topology detection with time-series signature verification method. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. 2018;33(4):3500-3509.
5. Ponce C, Bindel DS. FLiER: Practical topology update detection using sparse PMUs. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. 2017;32(6):4222–4232.
6. Srikumar MS, Ananthapadmanbha Dr.T, Khan F.Z, et al. Line outage detection using phasor measurement units. In: Procedia Technology 21 (2015), SMART GRID Technologies; August 6–8; 2015. рp. 88–95.
7. Gotman NE, Shumilova GP, Startseva TB. Identifikatsiya topologii elektricheskoy seti na osnove iskusstvennykh neyronnykh setey s ispol'zovaniyem vektornykh izmereniy In: Rudenko International Conference Metodological problems in reliability study of large energy systems Vyp. 66. Aktual'nyye problemy nadezhnosti sistem energetiki; 7-11 Sen 2015; Minsk, Byelorussia. Minsk: BNTU, 2015. pp. 251 - 257.
8. Shumilova GP, Gotman NE, Startseva TB. Opredeleniye topologii elektricheskoy seti pri delenii yeye na uchastki s privyazkoy k ustroystvam PMU. In: Rudenko International Conference Metodological problems in reliability study of large energy systems Vyp. 67. Problemy nadezhnosti sistem energetiki; 4-9 Jul 2016; Syktyvkar, Russia. Syktyvkar: OOO «Komi respublikanskaya tipografiya», 2016. pp. 250 -255.
9. Gotman NE, Shumilova GP, Startseva TB. Opredeleniye topologii elektricheskoy seti s ispol'zovaniyem sinkhronizirovannykh vektornykh izmer eniy. In: Pyatoyy Vserossiyskiy nauchnyy seminar «Aktual'nyye problemy, napravleniya i mekhanizmy razvitiya proizvoditel'nykh sil Severa». 21-23 Sen 2016; Syktyvkar, Russia. Syktyvkar: OOO «Komi respublikanskaya tipografiya», 2016;2:15-123.
10. Cardoso P.E. A deep learning applied to PMU data in power systems: Ph.D. thesis. Faculdade De Engenharia Da Universidade Do Porto. 2017. 105 p. Available at: https://repositorioaberto.up.pt/bitstream/10216/106289/2/204483.pdf. Accessed to: 21 Nov 2020.
11. Schmidhuber J. Deep learning in neural networks: an overview. Neural Networks. 2015;61:85–117. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003 .
12. Shi H, Xu M.H, Li R. Deep learning for household load forecasting-A novel pooling deep RNN // IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid. 2017;9(5):5271–5280.
13. Wang H.Z, Ruan JQ, Wang G, et al. Deep learning-based interval state estimation of AC smart grids against sparse cyber attacks. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics. 2018;14(11):4766–4778.
14. Li WT, Deka D, Chertkov M, et al. Real-time faulted line localization and PMU placement in power systems through convolutional neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. 2019;34(6):4640–4651.
15. Muhammad A, Lee JM, Hong S.W, et al. Deep learning application in power system with a case study on solar irradiation forecasting. In: Proceedings Int. Conf. Artif. Intell. Inf. Commun. (ICAIIC). Feb. 2019. pp. 275–279.
16. Zhang D, Xiaoqing H, Chunyu D. Review on the research and practice of deep learning and reinforcement learning in smart grids. CSEE Journal of Power and Energy System. 2018;4(3):362–370.
17. Xiao M, Wang S, Ullah Z, et al. Topology detection in power distribution system using kernelnode-map deep networks. IET Gener., Transm. Distrib. 2020;14(19):4033–4041. doi: 10.1049/ietgtd.2020.0048.
18. Schmidhuber J. Deep learning in neural networks: an overview. Neural Networks. 2015;61:85–117. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.00319.
19. Haykin Simon. Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation. Second edition. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458. 1998 (Russ. ed.: Khaykin S. Neyronnyye seti: polnyy kurs. 2 -ye izd., ispr. / per. s angl. Moscow: OOO «I.D.Vil'yams». 2006; 1104 p.
20. Sozykin AV. Obzor metodov obucheniya glubokikh neyronnykh setey. Bulletin of the South Ural State University Series «Computational Mathematics and Software Engineering». 2017;6(3):28–59. doi: 10.14529/cmse170303.
21. Patterson Josh, Gibson Adam. Deep Learning. A practitioner's approach. Patterson Dzh., Gibson A. Glubokoye obucheniye s tochki zreniya praktika / per. s ang. Moscow: DMK Press., 2018; 418 p.
22. Khokhlov MV, Golub II. Unifitsirovannyy podkhod k optimizatsii razmeshcheniya PMU v seti dlya obespecheniya nadezhnosti nablyudayemosti EES. In: Rudenko International Conference «Metodological problems in reliability study of large energy systems». Nadezhnost' liberalizovannykh sistem energetiki; 30 Jun-04 Jul 2014; Saint-Petersburg, Russia: Irkutsk: ISEM SO RAN, 2015;65:251-257.
Review
For citations:
Gotman N.E., Shumilova G.P. Identification of line status changes using phasor measurements through deep learning networks. Power engineering: research, equipment, technology. 2020;22(6):55-67. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30724/1998-9903-2020-22-6-55-67
Views:
323
Email this article 