Analysis dynamic characteristics brushless motor of the mechatronic system in conditions of parametric uncertaintyby computer simulation methods

THE PURPOSE. Currently, brushless motors – electric machines with permanent magnets on the rotor and a rotor position sensor controlled by a sinusoidal voltage from frequency converters, are widely used in mechatronic and robotic systems. The control algorithm is formed on the basis of information about the current values of the parameters brushless motor mechatronic system using a nominal or reference mathematical model, which is, as a rule, an idealized representation of a real device. The non-stationarity of the parameters object of study, as well as the possible uncertainty of its mathematical description due to the simplification of the mathematical model, lead to undesirable or unacceptable results when forming the control algorithm of the mechatronic system. The problem arises of analyzing the dynamic characteristics of a brushless motor under conditions of parametric uncertainty in order to determine the parameters that most affect the functioning of the mechatronic system and the phase coordinates that are sensitive to these changes.

METHODS. When solving the problem, methods of the sensitivity theory are used to obtain the corresponding vector-matrix equations, the solution of which is carried out by means of the MatLab software environment.

RESULTS. In this paper, sensitivity equations are obtained for the active resistance and projections of the stator winding inductance on the longitudinal and transverse coordinate axes, as well as for the moment of inertia of the brushless motor. A vector-matrix block diagram for calculating the sensitivity functions of a brushless motor is formed, the characteristic feature of which is the presence of a non-zero matrix of free terms, reduced to the input of the sensitivity model. The corresponding Simulink models were built to study the influence of the listed quasi-stationary parameters on the rotation speed and torque on the shaft of the object of study. An analysis of the statistical characteristics additional motion of the specified phase coordinates of the brushless motor has been carried out, and graphical dependencies and steady-state values of dispersions and relative estimates have been obtained.

CONCLUSION. An analysis of the dynamic characteristics of a brushless motor under conditions of parametric uncertainty made it possible to determine that the rotation speed of the machine is the most sensitive to parametric disturbances. This coordinate is the most informative and is of maximum interest in the formation of an optimization algorithm for a mechatronic system. The decisive role in the formation of the additional movement of the output coordinates of the brushless motor is made by a change in the projection of the stator inductance on the transverse coordinate axis, which is an order of magnitude greater than the contribution to the additional movement of coordinates from other unstable parameters. It is expedient to use the results obtained in the course of the study when constructing an optimal control algorithm for a mechatronic system under conditions of parametric uncertainty.

1. Ma Q., El-Refaie A., Lequesne B. Low-Cost Interior Permanent Magnet Machine with a Blend of Magnet Types. IEEE International Electric Machines & Drives Conference (IEMDC), 2019; 1303-1310. 2. Huynh T.A., Hsieh M-F. Performance Analysis of Permanent Magnet Motors for Electric Vehicles (EV) Traction Considering Driving Cycles. Energies, 2018; 11(6):1385.

2. Frolov V. Y. & Zhiliglotov R. I. Development of sensorless vector control system for permanent magnet synchronous motor in Matlab Simulink, Journal of Mining Institute, 2018; 229: 92. 4. Bazylev D.N., Pyrkin A.A., Bobtsov A.A. Algorithm for adaptive sensorless control of synchronous motors. Scientific and Technical Journal of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics, 2018; 18(1): 24–31.

3. Ortega R., Praly L., Astolfi A., Lee J., Nam K. Estimation of rotor position and speed of permanent magnet synchronous motors with guaranteed stability // IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2011; 19(3): 601–614. 6. A. K. Morya et al. Wide Bandgap Devices in AC Electric Drives: Opportunities and Challenges, in IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification, 2019; 5(1): 3-20.

4. J. He et al., Multi-Domain Design Optimization of dv/dt Filter for SiC-Based Three-Phase Inverters in High-Frequency Motor-Drive Applications" in IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 2019; 55(5): 5214-5222.

5. R. A. Torres, H. Dai, W. Lee, T. M. Jahns and B. Sarlioglu, Development of Current-Source-Inverter-based Integrated Motor Drives using Wide-Bandgap Power Switches, 2019 IEEE 15th Brazilian Power Electronics Conference and 5th IEEE Southern Power Electronics Conference (COBEP/SPEC), 2019; 1-6.

6. Petrov T.I., Safin A.R., Ivshin I.V., Tsvetkov A.N., Kornilov V.Yu. MODEL OF THE CONTROL SYSTEM ROCKING MACHINES OF OIL THE BASIC OF A SYNCHRONOUS ENGINES WITH THE SENSORLESS METHOD. Power engineering: research, equipment, technology. 2018;20(7-8):107-116. (In Russ.).

7. N. A. Malev, A. I. Mukhametshin and O. V. Pogoditsky. Analysis and Study of the Dynamic Processes of a Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor with a Wide Range of Parameter Variations Using the Reference Model, 2019 International Multi-Conference on Industrial Engineering and Modern Technologies (FarEastCon), Vladivostok, Russia, 2019; 1-6.

8. S. Akita, T. Higuchi, Y. Yokoi, H. Saikusa, T. Abe, S. Makino, "Experimental Characteristics of a Line-Start Permanent Magnet Motor", The 19th International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems (ICEMS 2016) DS2G–1–17, 2016.

9. Joost Bolder, Stephan Kleinendorst, and Tom Oomen. “Data-driven multivari-able ILC: enhanced performance by eliminating L and Q filters.”InternationalJournal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 2018; 28(12):3728–3751. 13. T. Inoue, Y. Inoue, S. Morimoto and M. Sanada, "Mathematical Model for MTPA Control of Permanent-Magnet Synchronous Motor in Stator Flux Linkage Synchronous Frame," in IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 2015; 51(5): 3620-3628.

10. S. Li and Z. Liu, "Adaptive Speed Control for Permanent-Magnet Synchronous Motor System With Variations of Load Inertia," in IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2009; 56(8): 3050-3059.

11. C. He and T. Wu, "Analysis and design of surface permanent magnet synchronous motor and generator," in CES Transactions on Electrical Machines and Systems, 2019; 3(1): 94-100.

12. M. Bucolo, A. Buscarino, L. Fortuna and C. Famoso, "Stochastic resonance in imperfect electromechanical systems,"2020 IEEE 29th International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE), 2020; 210-214. 17. Bolzern, P., P. Colaneri, G. de Nicolao, and U. Snaked, “Guaranteed H ∞ Robustness Bounds for Wiener Filtering and Prediction,”Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Contr., 2001; 12: 41–56.

13. Afanasiev A.Y., Makarov V.G., Zagirova V.N. Identification of parameters and rotor speed of the induction motor with the sensitivity functions // Mathematical methods in engineering and technology-MMTT. 2020; 6: 128-131.

14. Eremin E.L. Combined system with an implicit standard for a class of uncertain a priory singlechannel non-affine control plants on the set of operation states. Information Science and Control Systems. 2018; 3(57): 93-103. 20. Malev N.A., Pogoditsky O.V., Cvetkovich A.M. Features of application of sensitivity theory for analysis of influence of parametric disturbances on dynamic properties electromechanical converters. Power engineering: research, equipment, technology. 2019; 21(6):101-110. (In Russ.). 21. Malev N.A., Mukhametshin A.I., Pogoditsky O.V., Chichkov P.V. Comparative analysis of hardware and software of the monitoring method of fun ctioning electromechanical DC converters. Power engineering: research, equipment, technology. 2020; 22(5):142-154. (In Russ.).

15. Dr. Sasi Bhanu J, Dr. Baswaraj D, Sunitha Devi Bigul, and Dr. JKR Sastry. Generating Test cases for Testing Embedded Systems using Combinatorial Techniques and Neural Networks based Learning Model, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering Research, 2019; 7(7): 417-429. 23. S. Herasimov, V. Pavlii, O. Tymoshchuk and other.Testing Signals for Electronics: Criteria for Synthesis, Journal of Electronic Testing, 2019; 35(148): 1-9.