Comparison of P&O and ANFIS methods for monitoring the maximum power point of photovoltaic modules in electrical complexes
https://doi.org/10.30724/1998-9903-2025-27-1-37-47
Abstract
Photovoltaic energy depends on the conversion of sunlight into electricity. In recent years, the price of solar power plant equipment has dropped sharply, which has led to the increase of photovoltaic power generation in recent years. There is a trend of decreasing cost of solar panels and power plant equipment, and this has caused the increase of electricity generated from PV modules.
OBJECTIVE. To develop a system to maximize the power output of PV panels under changing solar irradiance and temperature conditions.
METHODS. This study compares two methods that can improve the working efficiency of PV modules by determining the maximum power point, ANFIS and P&O.
RESULTS. This paper explains the step-by-step process, simulation and disturbance and observation analysis by ANFIS and P&O using MATLAB/Simulink software. The P&O method works better in stable conditions, but its effectiveness drops sharply with sudden changes in lighting. On the other hand, ANFIS is more resistant to changes and is able to adapt to new conditions, which makes it a more versatile tool.
CONCLUSION. Therefore, when choosing an approach to MPP tracking, it is worth considering many factors, including operating conditions, available resources, and goals. The P&O method is an excellent solution for less demanding conditions and simple installations, while ANFIS provides solutions for more complex and dynamic applications. The main thing to emphasize is the need for a thorough assessment of the situation and the selection of the most suitable method for specific conditions. Determining the right strategy can significantly improve the performance of PV modules and increase their overall efficiency within electrical complexes.
Keywords
About the Authors
T. I. PetrovRussian Federation
Timur I. Petrov
Kazan
N. K. Ali
Russian Federation
Ali Nisrin Karim
Kazan
A. R. Petrova
Russian Federation
Anastasia R. Petrova
Kazan
R. R. Gibadullin
Russian Federation
Ramil R. Gibadullin
Kazan
References
1. Liu F, Duan S, Liu B, and Kang Y. A variable step size INC MPPT method for PV systems. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics. 2008; 55(7):2622–2628.
2. Tyagi VV, Rahim NAA, Rahim NA, and Selvaraj JAL. Progress in solar PV technology: research and achievement. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2013; 20:443– 461.
3. Yılmaz M, Corapsiz M. PSO Training Neural Network MPPT with CUK Converter Topology for Stand-Alone PV Systems Under Varying Load and Climatic Conditions. TJNS. 2024; 13(1):88–97.
4. Khan MJ, Pushparaj. A novel hybrid maximum power point tracking controller based on artificial intelligence for solar photovoltaic system under variable environmental conditions. Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology. 2021; 16(4):1879-1889.
5. Padmavathi N, Chilambuchelvan A, Shanker NR. Maximum power point tracking during partial shading effect in PV system using machine learning regression controller. Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology. 2021; 16, 737-748.
6. Basha CH, Murali M. A new design of transformerless, non‐isolated, high step‐up DC‐DC converter with hybrid fuzzy logic MPPT controller. International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications. 2022; 50(1), 272-297.
7. Gibadullin RF. Organization of secure data transmission in a sensor network based on AVR microcontrollers. Cybernetics and Programming. 2018;6:80-86.
8. Nuriev MG, Gizatullin RM, Mukhamadiev AA. Study of the noise immunity of computer technology under electromagnetic influences through the metal structure of a building based on physical modeling. Journal of Radio Electronics. 2019;4:10.
9. Petrov TI, Safin AR, Nizamiev MF, Basenko VR. Application of genetic algorithm in development of software for material selection in optimization of synchronous motors. Bulletin of Kazan State Power Engineering University. 2022;14,2(54):96-105.
10. Safin A., Kopylov A., Gibadullin R., Petrov T., Khusnutdinov R., Fedorov O. Thermal Model of a Linear Electric Machine. 2019 1st International Conference on Control Systems, Mathematical Modelling, Automation and Energy Efficiency (SUMMA), Lipetsk, Russia. 2019:8 426-428.
11. Safin A.R., Ivshin I.V., Gracheva E.I., Petrov T.I. Development of a mathematical model of an autonomous power supply source with a free-piston motor based on a synchronous electric machine of reciprocating action with permanent magnets. News of higher educational institutions. Problems of energy. 2020;22(1):38-48.
12. Tabachnikova TV, Gracheva EI, Naumov OV, et al. Forecasting technical state and efficiency of electrical switching devices at electric complexes in oil and gas industry. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Almetyevsk, Republic of Tatarstan, 2020:012014.
13. Gracheva E., Toshkhodzhaeva M., Rahimov O., Dadabaev S., et. al. Modeling the Reliability of High-Voltage Power Transmission Lines Taking into Account the Influence of the Parameters of a Sharply Continental Climate. International Journal of Technology, 2020;11(8):1557-1569.
14. Khan MJ, Pushparaj. A novel hybrid maximum power point tracking controller based on artificial intelligence for solar photovoltaic system under variable environmental conditions. Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology. 2021; 16(4), 1879-1889.
15. Yılmaz M, Kaleli A, Çorapsız MF. Machine learning based dynamic super twisting sliding mode controller for increase speed and accuracy of MPPT using real-time data under PSCs. Renewable Energy. 2023; 219, 119470
16. Aygül K, Cikan M, Demirdelen T, Tumay M. Butterfly optimization algorithm based maximum power point tracking of photovoltaic systems under partial shading condition. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects. 2023; 45(3), 8337-8355.
17. Bouarroudj N, Benlahbib B, Houam Y, Sedraoui M, Batlle VF, Abdelkrim T, et al. Fuzzy based incremental conductance algorithm stabilized by an optimal integrator for a photovoltaic system under varying operating conditions. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects. 2021; 1-26.
18. Tokarev I.S. Development of parameters for an industry-specific methodology for calculating the electric energy storage system for gas industry facilities // Journal of Mining Institute. 2024. p. EDN UIZSOQ.
Review
For citations:
Petrov T.I., Ali N.K., Petrova A.R., Gibadullin R.R. Comparison of P&O and ANFIS methods for monitoring the maximum power point of photovoltaic modules in electrical complexes. Power engineering: research, equipment, technology. 2025;27(1):37-47. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30724/1998-9903-2025-27-1-37-47