Economic efficiency of systems using solid oxide fuel cells powered by natural gas

The use of natural gas fuel cells can significantly increase the sustainability and efficiency of energy supply to private homes, provide important environmental benefits and reduce energy costs. However, the widespread use of natural gas fuel cells in residential buildings is limited by a number of factors, among which the most significant is the high cost of a fuel cell. The study analyzes energy consumption for two energy supply systems, a standard system based on a double-circuit gas boiler and a system using a solid oxide fuel cell powered by natural gas. purpose. To determine the economic feasibility of using solid oxide fuel cells (TTE) on natural gas in private residential buildings.

Methods. Data on energy consumption of the analyzed building was collected using meter readings. Based on these data, annual schedules of electricity and natural gas consumption were created. The scheme of the energy supply system of a private house using TTE, as well as the equation of the mathematical model of natural gas consumption by the system with TTE, were based on the laws of conservation of energy and mass, as well as using statistical methods for analyzing existing research in the field of fuel cell applications. results. During the study, a graph of the dynamics of energy prices by month was compiled for the two compared systems. conclusion. The introduction of energy supply systems based on solid oxide fuel cells (TTE) powered by natural gas in residential buildings may be a promising solution. A comparison of a system based on a double-circuit gas boiler without a TTE and a system with a TTE on natural gas showed that monthly savings range from 24% to 47%, with an average annual value of 34.5%. For a family of three living in a two-storey brick house in Kazan, Republic of Tatarstan, this means an annual savings of 25,080 rubles.

1. Roy D., Samanta S., Roy S., Smallbone A., Roskilly A.P. Technoeconomic and environmental performance assessment of solid oxide fuel cell-based cogeneration system configurations // Energy. 2024. Vol. 310, №133145. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.133145.

2. Lipilin A.S., Nefedkin S.I., Chukharev V.F., Kiselev I.V., Kozlov S.I., Yudin A.L. Energy supply of low-rise housing based on the efficient use of natural gas in the TTE technology // International Scientific Journal for Alternative Energy and Ecology. 2010. № 883.

3. Singla M., Nijhawan P., Oberoi A. Hydrogen fuel and fuel cell technology for cleaner future: a review // Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2021.Vol. 28. pp. 15607-15626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-12231-8.

4. Smorodova O.V., Kitaev S.V., Erilin I.S. On the possibilities of using primary gas as fuel for solid oxide components // Norwegian Journal for the Development of International Science. 2018. № 4-1. c. 51-54.

5. Choudhary T., Kumar Sahu M., Sanjay. CFD modeling of SOFC cogeneration system for building application // Energy Procedia. 2017. Vol. 109. pp. 361-368. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.087.

6. Sobyanin V.A. High-temperature solid oxide fuel cells and methane conversion // Russian Chemical Journal. 2003. vol. XLVII. No. 6.

7. Ahmadi S., Ghaebi H., Shokri A. A comprehensive thermodynamic analysis of a novel CHP system based on SOFC and APC cycles // Energy. 2019. Vol. 186. № 115899. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.115899.

8. Heidarshenas B., Abdullah M.M., Sajadi S.M., Yuan Y., Malekshah E.H., Aybar H. Exergy and environmental analysis of SOFC-based system including reformers and heat recovery approaches to establish hydrogen-rich streams with least exergy loss // International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2024. Vol. 52. pp. 845-853. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.10.243.

9. Roy D., Samanta S., Roy S., Smallbone A., Roskilly A.P. Technoeconomic and environmental performance assessment of solid oxide fuel cell-based cogeneration system configurations // Energy. 2024. Vol. 310. № 133145. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.133145.

10. Filimonova A.A., Chichirov A.A., Chichirova N.D., Pechenkin A.V. Review of design schemes of hybrid systems with a solid oxide fuel cell and a gas turbine for combined heat and power generation // Journal of Siberian Federal University. un-ta. Machinery and technology. 2022, 15(7). pp. 812-834.

11. Baldi F., Wang L., Perez-Fortes M., Marechal F. A Cogeneration system based on solid oxide and proton exchange membrane fuel cells with hybrid storage for off-grid applications // Frontiers in energy research. 2019. Vol. 6. № 139. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2018.00139.

12. SP 50.13330.2024 "SNIP 23-02-2003 Thermal protection of buildings".

13. GOST 5542-2014 "Natural combustible gases for industrial and municipal purposes. Technical specifications".

14. Resolution of the State Committee of the Republic of Tatarstan on Tariffs dated 12/15/2023 No. 682-24/E-2023.

15. Resolution of the State Committee of the Republic of Tatarstan on Tariffs dated 12/19/2023 No. 818-1/g-2023