ANALYSIS OF LAYOUT SOLUTIONS OF ELECTROLYSIS SHOP OF HYDROGEN SUPERSTRUCTURE TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE RELIABILITY AND EXPLOSION RISK
https://doi.org/10.30724/1998-9903-2018-20-5-6-29-36
Abstract
The article considers the layout solutions of the electrolysis shop of the hydrogen superstructure outside the territory of the nuclear power plant. To do this, an annual risk assessment was carried out taking into account the reliability and explosion risk for 1-4, 8 and 16 separate electrolysis shops installed on the site of the hydrogen superstructure. When taking into account equipment breakdowns, with possible explosions and fires in electrolysis plants, the risk due to fires and explosions was several times lower than the risk associated with equipment failures. Calculations showed that the transfer of electrolysis plants to increased hydrogen productivity in the event of failure of one of the cells is the best option in comparison with the reduction in the generation of electricity at the steam turbine installation of the hydrogen superstructure.
About the Authors
R. Z. Aminov
Saratov scientific center of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Rashid Z. Aminov – dr. Sci. (techn.)., professor, head.
Saratov.
A. V. Portyankin
Saratov state technical university of a name of Gagarin Yu.A.
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Aleksey V. Portyankin – сand. sci. (techn.), associate professor of the A.I. Andryushchenko Department “Thermal and Nuclear Power”.
Saratov.
References
1. Aminov R.Z., Bayramov A.N. Kombinirovanie vodorodnykh energeticheskikh tsiklov s atomnymi elektrostantsiyami. Saratovskiy nauchnyy tsentr RAN. M.: Nauka, 2016. 254 p.
2. Pravila bezopasnosti pri proizvodstve vodoroda metodom elektroliza vody: PB 03-598-03: utv. Gostekhnadzorom Rossii 06.06.03 [Elektronnyy resurs]. Sistem. trebovaniya: Adobe Acrobat Reader. – URL: http://himenergo.ru/usr/file/PB%2003-598-03.pdf (data obrascheniya: 25.08.2017).
3. Rukovodstvo po otsenke pozharnogo riska dlya promyshlennykh predpriyatiy // Moskva 2006 [Elektronnyy resurs]. Sistem. trebovaniya: Adobe Acrobat Reader. – URL: http://www.complexdoc.ru/ntdpdf/541573/rukovodstvo_po_otsenke_pozharnogo_riska_dlya_promyshlennykh_predpriyatii.pdf ((data obrascheniya: 25.08.2017).
4. Aminov R.Z., KHrustalev V.A., Portyankin A.V. Vzryvopozharoopasnost' na AES s vodorodnymi nadstroykami. Analiz problemy i puti resheniya // Trudy Akademenergo. 2013. No. 3. P. 41‒51.
5. Aminov R.Z., Khrustalev V.A., Portyankin A.V. The effectiveness of power generating complexes constructed on the basic of nuclear power plants combined with additional sources of energy determined taking risk factors into account // Thermal Engineering. 2015. Vol. 62. No. 2. P. 130‒137.
6. Aminov R.Z., Yurin V.E., Murtazov M.A. K uchetu perekhodnykh sostoyaniy sistemy pri provedenii veroyatnostnogo rascheta rezervirovaniya sobstvennykh nuzhd AES // Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Problemy energetiki. 2016. No. 5‒6. P. 3‒11.
7. Aminov R.Z., YUrin V.E. Veroyatnostnaya otsenka bezopasnosti AES v sostoyaniyakh obestochivaniya pri rezervirovanii sobstvennykh nuzhd na osnove vodorodnogo tsikla // Trudy Akademenergo, 2013. No. 2. P. 31‒39.
8. Station blackout. Regulatory Guide 1.155. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. USA. 1988.
9. Sabah J., Zaharija-Tiska D., Strbuncelj Z. Large diesel generators for nuclear power stations and processing industry. Koncar journal. 1988. No. 1. P. 41‒47.
10. Shpil'rayn E.E., Malyshenko S.P., Kuleshov G.G. Vvedenie v vodorodnuyu energetiku / pod redaktsiey Legasova V.A. M.: Energoatomizdat, 1984. 264 p.
Review
For citations:
Aminov R.Z., Portyankin A.V. ANALYSIS OF LAYOUT SOLUTIONS OF ELECTROLYSIS SHOP OF HYDROGEN SUPERSTRUCTURE TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE RELIABILITY AND EXPLOSION RISK. Power engineering: research, equipment, technology. 2018;20(5-6):29-36. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30724/1998-9903-2018-20-5-6-29-36
Views:
544
Email this article 