MODEL OF THE CONTROL SYSTEM ROCKING MACHINES OF OIL THE BASIC OF A SYNCHRONOUS ENGINES WITH THE SENSORLESS METHOD
https://doi.org/10.30724/1998-9903-2018-20-7-8-107-116
Abstract
Rocking machines of oil (RMO) are the main elements in the Russian oil industry in the field of low-yield wells. And increasing the energy efficiency of these machines is one of the most promising tasks in the interests of the oil and gas industry in Russia.
The use of intelligent energy-saving stations for controlling the machine-shaker of oil on the basis of synchronous engines makes it possible to optimize oil production, by increasing the volume of production and saving energy resources. The main disadvantage of these stations is high cost, which is a deterrent for widespread use.
One of the solutions to this problem is the use of a method that does not use the rotor position sensor, the so-called "sensorless method". However, all works related to the use of the "sensorless method" refer to the control systems of asynchronous motors.
In this paper, the advantages of the control systems of a rocking machine on the basis of synchronous motors in front of asynchronous motors will be presented, the variants of motor control and the execution of the "sensorless method" are considered. Mathematical models of all elements of the control station are presented: rocking machine, synchronous motor, vector control system.
About the Authors
T. I. PetrovRussian Federation
Timur I. Petrov ‒ postgraduate at the Department of «Power supply of industrial enterprises»
A. R. Safin
Russian Federation
Alfred R. Safin ‒ сand. sci. (techn.), assistant professor at the Department of «Power supply of industrial enterprises»
I. V. Ivshin
Russian Federation
Igor V. Ivshin ‒ doctor of Technical Sciences, associate professor at the Department of «Power supply of industrial enterprises»
A. N. Tsvetkov
Russian Federation
Alexey N. Tsvetkov ‒ сand. sci. (techn.), assistant professor at the Department of «Power supply of industrial enterprises»
V. Yu. Kornilov
Russian Federation
Vladimir Yu. Kornilov ‒ doctor of Technical Sciences, associate professor at the Department of «Instrument making and mechatronics»
References
1. Energy Strategy of Russia for the period up to 2030.
2. Weinger A.M. Adjustable electric drives of alternating current. М ., 2009. P. 102. (in Russian)
3. Kalachev Yu.N. Observers of the state in a vector electric drive. Moscow, 2013. P. 63. (in Russian)
4. Pankratov VV, Zima E.A. Energy-optimal vector control of asynchronous electric drives. Novosibirsk: Publishing House of the National Technical University, 2005. P. 120. (in Russian)
5. Vas P. Sensorless Vector and Direct Torque Control. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998. P. 376.
6. Kalachev Yu.N. Vector regulation (practice notes). EF: 2013. P. 63. (in Russian)
7. Trzynadlowski A.M., Kirlin R.L., Legowski S.F. Space vector PWM technique with minimum switching losses and a variable pulse rate // IEEE Transactions on Industrioal Electronics. 1997. P. 44.
8. Abd El Vkhab AR, Karakulov AS, Dementiev Yu.N., Kladiev SN Comparative analysis of vector control and direct torque control of a synchronous electric motor with permanent magnets. // Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University. 2011. № 4. Pp. 93–99. (in Russian)
9. Ryvkin Sergey. Sliding mode for synchronouselectric drive. Eduardo Palomar Lever – CRC Press. 2011. P. 208.
10. Zavyalov VM, Abd El Vkhab AR Differential control of the torque of a synchronous motor with permanent magnets // Modern electric drive. 2012. № 1. P. 8. (in Russian)
Review
For citations:
Petrov T.I., Safin A.R., Ivshin I.V., Tsvetkov A.N., Kornilov V.Yu. MODEL OF THE CONTROL SYSTEM ROCKING MACHINES OF OIL THE BASIC OF A SYNCHRONOUS ENGINES WITH THE SENSORLESS METHOD. Power engineering: research, equipment, technology. 2018;20(7-8):107-116. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30724/1998-9903-2018-20-7-8-107-116